Your Ad Here
Showing posts with label Cricket. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cricket. Show all posts

April 03, 2011

Team India Got Fake World Cup?


April 2nd, 2011 will never be forgotten by any Indian cricket lover. This was the historic day when Team India lifted the ICC World Cup trophy which was glittering in gold and dazzling brightly.

But, a latest update is that the trophy which was hugged and kissed so dearly is in fact, a fake!!!

Well, the reason for that happens to be rather silly- the original trophy was seized by the Mumbai customs as it was not exempted from import duty and was taken as soon as it arrived from Colombo on March 29th after the semifinals between Sri Lanka- New Zealand.

According to a mail received from a noted national media house, it is heard that team India had lifted the replica and not the original of the World Cup trophy which is worth $ 130000.

Sources say the original will now be heading to the ICC World Headquarters at Dubai without the men in blue even touching it after all the fight and struggle they did to achieve it. While the blame game has begun between the ICC and BCCI, few officials are doing the cover up acts, as per the media sources.

While some say that an original is never presented to the team, the photographs of captains Steve Waugh, Ricky Ponting receiving the original trophy during the 1999, 2003 and 2007 world cup has disproved it.

Also, the base of the trophy usually has the names of the winning team right from 1975 but it is heard that the one given to captain M S Dhoni at Wankhede Stadium had a blank black base. Meanwhile, a customs official revealed that the ICC has been insisting about a replica arriving from Colombo.

The national media source also revealed that the ICC officials claimed about the trophy having no commercial value and it was used for promotions only. However, a valuation was done and it turned out that the trophy was worth Rs 60 lakhs made of pure silver and gold. So, the question rises if it is a replica, does it have to be the same price as the original? It is also heard that the ICC letter mentioned that it was the trophy and no mention of a replica has been made.

As per a notification from department of revenue regarding the world cup tournament, a total of five broad categories were meant to be allowed but interestingly, there was no mention of the World Cup Trophy in that. Some are also asking why the ICC and BCCI which are extremely rich are unwilling to pay the duty and release the original trophy. Well, only time will tell whether this information from the national media source is true or not.

New look Mahendra Singh Dhoni!




BRITISH MEDIA HAILS INDIA’S WORLD CUP VICTORY


“Masterly Dhoni brings joy to the whole of India” – read one of the several headlines in the British media, which gave a collective round of applause to the Indian team for ending its 28-year-old wait to lift a second World Cup title.
India defeated Sri Lanka by six wickets in the final in Mumbai last night to lift the coveted trophy which they last won in 1983 under Kapil Dev.
The press here was full of praise for current Indian skipper Dhoni, who led from the front with a 91-run knock, to guide India home while chasing a stiff 275 for victory.
“The epitome of new India dominated the match (World Cup final between India and Sri Lanka),” ‘The Observer’ commented on Sunday.
“Masterly Dhoni brings joy to the whole of India,” said ’The Guardian’
“Dhoni is young enough to lead India to the next World Cup when he will be quite a rich man. Sachin Tendulkar could only contribute the briefest of cameos in his home town, 18 in 14 balls,” said the newspaper’s cricket writer Vic Marks.
“As for Muralitharan, initially he was treated with respect, but towards the end Dhoni punched him through the covers with awesome power. By the standards of old, Murali was bowling donkey drops and with his body creaking, he could not muster any more venom.
“Towards the end he held out his hands in exasperation at the wet ball, at the misfields, but the true cause of his despair was the realisation that he was impotent to stem the Indian tide. Sangakkara did not even turn to him when the position was dire,” he added.
The ‘News of the World’, headlined its story “Justice Dhon, India’s joy after toss row.”
It said, “Sri Lanka skipper Kumar Sangakkara was at the center of a cheat row before India stormed to a thrilling six-wicket World Cup win.
“Indian captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni ultimately smashed a huge six with 10 balls to spare to start the mother of all parties in the host country,” it said.
According to the ‘Sunday Times’, India’s victory will be all the sweeter for it came without a major score from Sachin Tendulkar or Virender Sehwag. In the past, they might have wobbled but the middle order looked solid as it produced stands of 83, 109 and 54.
“The way Gautam Gambhir, Virat Kohli, M.S. Dhoni and Yuvraj Singh batted showed a self-assurance that had not been so evident when collapsing against England, South Africa and West Indies in the group stage.”
In another write up in the same newspaper, Martin Johnson wrote “Nerveless Dhoni puts his house in order.”
“India’s captain and his team take pressure in their stride on way to a famous triumph.
“The hush when Sehwag was out to the second ball of the innings was nothing compared to the one when Tendulkar failed to expedite the script that had him winning the game single-handedly with his 100th international hundred, and anyone watching at home must have thought they’d accidentally sat down on the mute button,” he said.
“It must have been tough for Dhoni to watch, which is perhaps why he promoted himself in the order. There was a job to do, and the captain decided to do it. Mind you, it shouldn’t have been difficult to motivate himself. It was partly through a burning desire to do it for Mother India, but mostly a determination not to have to get the double-glazers in,” he added.
The newspaper said India’s victory will add spice to England’s summer.
“India are due to tour to play four Tests and five one-day internationals and the teams then meet for five ODIs and three Twenty20s in India later in the year.”
The ‘Sunday Telegraph’ said, “India owed their second World Cup to their magnificent batsmen. Their two finest – Sachin Tendulkar and Virender Sehwag -did not score 20 between them, yet the remaining Indian batsmen knocked off the runs with six wickets and ten balls to spare in the highest successful run-chase that any of the ten cup finals has seen.”
The report said, “the weight of expectation on India was enormous – from the outset of this tournament they have been the favourites – but they followed the example of their captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni in withstanding it.”

April 02, 2011

India vs Sri Lanka Final Full Match Highlights : Cricket World Cup 2011

Why MS Dhoni - The Best Captain Ever ?

On the occasion of Indian cricket team winning the world cup, each player of this victorious squad will get Rs.1 crore as a gift from the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), as per an announcement tonight. Though it is not the money, winning of cup matters and boys have done brilliant job to make every Indian proud. Coach Gary Kirsten and other support staff will get Rs. 50 Lakh each as reward for their contribution while selectors will be rewarded with Rs. 25 lakh each, President of BCCI said.

This is first time in World Cricket history that a single captain ms dhoni is holding all three championships viz. ODI World Championship, T 20 Championship and top position in Test Match rankings. Way to go Jharkhand dynamite...you are the best captain ever! 

Winning Moments -- World Cup Final: India Versus Sri Lanka In Mumbai 2011










World Cup Final: India Versus Sri Lanka In Mumbai 2011






Pre-Game:
Madhusudhan Ramakrishnan of Cricinfo has put together an excellent compendium of statistics leading up to today's final in the ICC's quadrennial showpiece. Here are some bullet-pointed takeaways:
  • India has played Sri Lanka 33 times since 2008, winning 18 and losing 13.
  • Five of those 33 games were played in India, with a 3-1 record favoring the home team.
  • In all games played between the two sides since 2000, India leads 11-3.
  • Of these 14 games, 11 have been won by the team chasing.
  • Of India's 11 wins, nine have come chasing a target against what is being touted as the best defensive bowling and fielding outfit in the business.
  • However, in World Cup match ups and finals of big tournaments between the two sides Sri Lanka has won 7 and lost 2 to India.
  • In these nine games that ended in results, 7 times the team batting first has won.
  • In World Cup matches alone, the team batting first has won the last four encounters between these two sides.
Sri Lanka: Overs 1-10:
Most people wouldn't pick a World Cup final to try a gamble -- but MS Dhoni is not most people. His instinctive preference is a 3-seam, 1-spin attack and with Ashish Nehra out with a finger injury, Dhoni picked Sreesanth (whom he hasn't picked since that initial outing in the Cup-opener against Bangladesh) over Ashwin.
As gambles go, this one is potentially huge -- if the maverick bowler can keep his wits about him, he could be a game changer; lose the plot, and his ten overs could be what costs India the game.
What works in its favor is that India lost the toss on the second try -- and got to bowl first. If there is movement at the Wankhede, it is early on, when there is a bit of moisture left and before the sun has a chance to burn it off. And movement is what makes Sree dangerous, thanks to his ability to move it one way in the air and bring it back off the seam.
Zaheer Khan, whose last appearance at a World Cup final turned into a personal nightmare, turned it on with an exhibition of controlled swing that produced three back to back maidens at the start of his spell. At the other end, Sreesanth got the expected movement, but his radar needed fine tuning, with the ball tending to home in towards leg stump as opposed to the ideal middle/middle-off line.
The best part of the opening exchanges was India's fielding -- particularly Yuvraj at point backed by Raina at cover. The two fielders covered each other and between them, shut the area down -- crucial, as against Zaheer in particular, the left handed Tharanga was unable to get the ball square, and Zaheer wasn't giving him anything to hit straight.
With the pressure on, Dilshan pulled -- not convincingly, but hard enough to carry the midwicket fielder in the ring -- Sreesanth, off the first ball of the 6th over, to bring up Lanka's first boundary. One ball later the bowler, who had cranked his pace up to around the 145 mark, bowled the first loose delivery of the game -- short, outside off, just in the slot for Dilshan to hit the first authentic shot of the innings, through point.
At the other end Zaheer, who for three overs had been setting Taranga up, forcing him to play to the field and neutering his best shots (nothing for the drive, nothing for the cut), took him out with the first ball of the 7th over: a regulation dismissal, with the bowler going close to the stumps, hitting the line just outside off and getting it to hold its line. The batsman, set up to expect movement away, played at it away from the body, got the edge, and was well held by a diving Sehwag at first slip. At that point, Zaheer had bowled 19 balls without a run being scored, and a wicket in the bag (4-3-2-1 at the end of that over).
Sree's 3-0-15-0 opening salvo wasn't bad, as bad bowling goes, but it wasn't incisive enough to complement the brilliant Zaheer. And that brought the first change, with Munaf Patel coming in, and promptly getting swing and seam. While on that, it's worth mentioning that neither form of movement is pronounced, but just enough to mess with the batsman's timing.
Overall, this session was India's: they had their thinking caps on, knew what lines and lengths to bowl to each of the batsmen, had their fielders in the right place, and played as a unit. Against that, Sri Lanka's three batsmen on view have seemed a tad nervous and/or tentative, and seemingly unable yet to match the opposition's intensity.
If you had to pick a 'Man of 10 overs', Zaheer (5-3-6-1) would win hands down. With point policeman Yuvraj (who, in the 10th over, flew yards to his right to pull off a save off a Dilshan square drive) a very good second choice. Zak and the Indian fielders (and what was good to see was that everyone was committed, with the likes of Zaheer and Sreesanth producing superb saves on the line) between them ensured that Sri Lanka got off to its worst start of the tournament: a big wicket down, and not enough runs to show for it. 31/1 in 10 beats Lanka's previous lowest in this tournament -- 42/0 against Pakistan.
PS: You have to wonder just how much ink will be spilt, after this game, on the toss that wasn't. Dhoni tossed, Sanga called, no one heard what the call was -- or at least, neither Shastri who was yelling into the mike, nor Jeff Crowe the match referee, did. With rather undue haste, Shastri suggested they toss again. They did. Sanga won, and opted to take first strike.
Is that how you want to start a World Cup final? No. Is that something either team wants to have preying on their minds? Equally, no.

Sri Lanka: Overs 11-20:
MS Dhoni's gameplan was clear from the get-go: pack the off side, keep the ball on that side, and shut the Sri Lankan stroke-makers down. As tactics go, this one is hard to fault -- the wicket is good for batting on (this is not the Premadasa with the ball coming knee high), and the first objective had to be to keep the Lankans from breaking free in the early overs, so the middle ones could be controlled by the spinners.
Field setting, complemented by the right lines, had much to do with this. Dilshan loves hitting square on both sides, so the bowlers kept the ball on fuller length and within the stumps most of the time. Against that, Kumar loves to bat in the V, where he is at his stylish best -- and for him, the bowlers focused on being a bit wider while staying on the full side, forcing him to open his bat face in a way that is not his first choice of stroke.
Munaf and Sreesanth continued the good work of the first 10 overs, during the bowling power play. Against that, and with Dilshan unable to break free (credit largely to the bowling, which was along lines calculated to deny Dilshan's strengths), Kumar Sangakkara took the onus of batting Lanka out of jail on himself, and in the 13th over waltzed down to chip Sreesanth over the mid on fielder, then unfurled a glorious straight drive to make sure India wasn't getting things all its way.
That assault saw the beginnings of a sight familiar to Indian cricket fans: the gradual implosion of Sreesanth. Those two hits messed with the bowler's equanimity (despite 'big brother' Zak walking him back to his mark after each ball, getting in his ear with calming words); off the next ball he was warned for running on the pitch, and his response was a no ball. Off the resulting free hit, Dilshan thick-edged the ball down to third man for a four to complete a 15 run over. The previous highest was the 8th, also by Sreesanth, when Dilshan took him for two fours.
What that over did was force Dhoni to rethink his bowling strategy, and bring Harbhajan on in the 15th over -- at least three, four overs I'd suspect before he would have wanted to. Harbhajan began (as he so often does these days) with a round the wicket line that seemed designed more to contain than to attack. Predictably, the opening over was tight (2 runs) but not incisive.
Sri Lanka reached 58/1 at the end of 15, with the bowling power play done. At that point, the batsmen had played out 64 dot balls of the 90 legitimate deliveries bowled to them -- a far cry from their preferred method of working the ball around, pressuring the bowlers with relentless singles and pouncing on the inevitable errors. Another way of looking at this period is that Sreesanth gave 33 in his five, while the other three bowlers gave away 22 in their combined ten.
Clearly, the Lankans who had set their sights on a 270-plus score would have begun to feel pressure. And it showed in Dilshan's almighty heave of a sweep at Harbhajan, to the line on or just outside leg -- the kind of line you paddle, not really swing full on -- that saw the ball carrom from bat edge onto arm onto thigh and back onto leg stump. An unlucky dismissal, but the batsman contributed with an absolutely rank example of shot selection. 30 dot balls out of 39 faced points to the discomfort the normally free-wheeling opener plays, and the credit for neutralizing him belongs largely to India's super-efficient fielding inside the ring on the off, that time and again cut off his best shots.
Needing to slip through Sreesanth's overs at some point, MS brought him back in the 20th. Somehow, it only seems to happen to him -- that when he is having a bad day, everything that could possibly go wrong, and some that you thought couldn't, will. Here, Dhoni gave him a slip, then took it off after two balls, and the third one found Mahela's edge with late swing and flew through that precise point where the slip had been till then -- and ended at the third man fence.
After 20 overs, Sri Lanka is 83/2. In these ten overs, Lanka has made 52 runs for the loss of Dilshan -- which is good going, all things considered. The trick for the batting side is that the key phase is now on them: 20-40, when the older ball will see India taking the pace off and trying to make run scoring all that much more difficult.

Sri Lanka: Overs 21-30:
For some reason, this period saw India reverse its policy in the field, and pull its fielders back a bit. The immediate consequence was that Kumar and Mahela could work the ball around in a way the earlier tight cordon had not permitted, and that brought visible relief to the two Lankan senior bats.
Yuvraj was switched on in the 21st over, by which point Harbhajan had bowled 4 of his quota. The slow-and-slower phase was on, and the Lankans had to work to make pace on the ball. At the halfway point of the innings, 105/2 (Mahela 25/25, Kumar 39/58) constituted under-achievement on the part of the Lankans -- or more accurately, it constituted a tremendous performance by the Indians with the ball and in the field, with Sreesanth (39 in 6) the only aberration in an otherwise impeccable bowling card).
Just around the time the quiet accumulation of the Lankan batsmen began assuming problematic proportions, the wicket fell. Perhaps predictably, it was Yuvraj -- but for once, to a ball that deserved a boundary against his name. It was dragged down short, it was straight, it was going wide on the angle to the left hander, and Kumar Sangakkara's eyes lit up with the possibility. To his bad luck, he overhit, swinging far harder than he needed to to put the gift away, and ended up with the faintest of nicks to Dhoni (48/67).
The captain's 62 run partnership with his predecessor at 5.5 per over revived the Lankan innings just when it was falling apart -- but against that, it ended just when the team needed the two best bats to kick it up another notch, and India once again got the upper hand.
MS, still working on his Sreesanth problem, promptly brought the bowler back, to take advantage of a period when neither Mahela, nor new man Thilan Samaraweera, would feel comfortable attacking even the weakest link in the opposition lineup.
After 30 overs, Lanka had managed 132/3; having added 49  for the loss of Sangakkara during this ten over phase. On balance, India would be the happier of the two sides at this point: they have stopped the opposition from breaking free, despite having one fairly weak link in the attack; they've taken out three of the four dangermen in the Lankan batting line up; and with just 20 overs left, are in a position to restrict Lanka to less than the 270+ the batting side would have been looking at on this track.

Sri Lanka: Overs 31-40:
The thing about MS is that once something works for him, he makes it part of his operating template. The idea of slipping in an odd over from part-timers (and increasingly you can't include Yuvraj in this category) is one such. In the 33rd over, thus, he slipped in Sachin for two over of assorted all-sorts that fetched Lanka 12 runs. MS will consider that a bargain, since it allowed him to make up the two overs Sreesanth has yet to bowl. Also in keeping with his new-found idea, he slipped in a Kohli over at a time when the Lankans wouldn't be looking to attack; that helped save another of his good overs for the death.
The highlight of this phase was Mahela's half century -- at a tick better than a run a ball (49 balls, six fours). The stylish Lankan right hander has struggled through this tournament, but the final has thus far seen the best of him: all classy eleganvce, relaxed, assured, batting in a fashion that makes you understand why he is in Lankan circles regarded as the natural heir to the batting mantle of Roy Dias and Aravinda d'Silva.
Zaheer's introduction in the 38th over, following the mandatory ball change in the 35th, was a departure from Dhoni's norm, and a sign that the Indians were beginning to feel the strain of this partnership. While the run rate was not electric, the two batsmen were knocking the runs around with facile ease, never seeming threatened, and with each passing over, they were setting themselves, and their fellows in the hut, for the big-bang finish.
If that move was intended to produce a wicket, it did -- at the other end, where Samaraweera went a long way forward to sweep Yuvraj's straighter one, missed, and got it on the hip adjacent middle stump. Simon Taufel, who thus far has been spot on with his decisions, called it not out, then over-ruled himself on review, and India pulled one back just when the momentum of the game seemed to be shifting thanks to the 57-run stand at a healthy 5.5 with neither batsmen working up a sweat.
And then, in the 40th over, Zaheer struck what could be the mortal blow to Lanka's hopes of a really big score. As he so often does when bowling round the wicket with the older ball, he kept the pace closer to his current highs, and then produced the perfectly disguised slower one. Kapugedara was a lifetime early into his shot; all he managed was to get the higher half of the bat onto the ball and hit it straight to Raina, well inside the ring at cover.
After 40, Lanka was on 183/5. The platform they want is in place, but their hopes of maybe adding 90-100 runs in the last ten overs has been stymied by the two wickets that fell late in this phase. Kulasekhara has been promoted to try and slog a few, but India will feel at as the game heads into the straight, it is better placed than the opposition.

Sri Lanka: Overs 41-50:
Yuvraj (3). Munaf (6). Harbhajan (7). Munaf (6). Harbhajan (6). That is how the first five overs went during the key phase. And to add spice, Kulasekhara was lucky a nick audible in real time was not "conclusive evidence" on a review.
With 211/5 after 45, the batting power play was mandatory - and it was fairly surprising that the Lankans left it that late, allowing the Indians to keep Zaheer's three overs in reserve besides one of Harbhajan and two of Munaf -- in other words, five good overs plus one surplus.
A four in the 46th off Zaheer, two in the next off Munaf, were all good without however really breaking the game open. And then came the 48th -- Kulasekhara took a long stride out, and swatted Zaheer off length over the long on fence for a huge six. With a bit hit at the top of the over, all the pressure swings onto the bowler, and Jayawardene rubbed it in with two brilliant fours. The first saw him step away, let the ball bounce, and guide it over point, playing the upper cut to the fence. The next ball, fuller and on off, was driven with savage power to the long off boundary and even as the ball was racing to its destination, Mahela had his helmet off to mark his 100.
A century in a World Cup final is worth appreciating for its own sake, but this one, coming off 84 balls from a batsman who thus far has struggled to find his touch, coming too at a time when his mates, all in form, had struggled to make the pace was invaluable. It almost didn't matter that in trying to keep the strike, Jayawardene got Kulasekhara run out off the last ball of the Zaheer over that produced 17 runs.
Harbhajan and Zaheer bowled the innings out (incidentally, some 38 minutes behind schedule). 63 runs came off the power play -- including 18 off Zaheer Khan, who after a first five overs that produced 9 runs, gave away 51 runs in his last five, thanks to a spectacular assault by Perera, who bunched his muscles and swung away, aided by bowlers who bowled to his strength.
India now has a 274-run chase -- and more than most times, the critical bit, at least at the start, will be how long Viru Sehwag stays at the wicket. It is not an out of reach target -- but to get there, India will need to play out of its collective skin against a bowling and fielding side that, thanks to the heroics of Mahela and that late assault, will now be fancying its chances.

India innings: Overs 1-10:
For the second time in two games, Virender Sehwag stayed back to a good length ball and tried to work it off his legs. For the second time, he missed and was hit on the pads. For the second time, the umpire gave it out and again, Viru reviewed without benefit of consultation with partner. Just to round the deja view off, for the second time he was wrong, the umpire was right, and India at 0-1 had gotten off to a bad start, courtesy Lasith Malinga.
It was in the fourth over that breathing -- if you are an India fan -- became relatively easier. Not because of the ease with which Sachin Tendulkar picked length and slapped Nuwan Kulasekhara square on the off despite a cordon of three to stop that shot, but because of that autograph shot to the ball before that: a glide forward, an easy swing of the bat, a check at point of impact, and a pause to watch the ball speeding past the bowler, to the straight fence. It is when he is batting with a free mind that Tendulkar pulls that shot out so early in an innings, and as omens go that went a long way to off set the loss of Sehwag early.
Malinga was, as he always is, class -- fast, accurate, and spot on in his lines and his lengths. Sri Lanka's problem in the early exchanges was the lack of a bowler at the other end capable of maintaining that pressure. Nuwan Kulasekhara, in for this game, struggled to match that intensity, and the Indians worked him around the park when Tendulkar wasn't showing off some of his watermarked shots.
After two overs Thisara Perera (sometimes known as the 'India expert' for his inexplicable knack of performing only against the one team) was brought in for Kulasekhara. What works for Perera is his control over line and length, which in this case was tight enough to force Gambhir into taking risks with a swat dangerously past point.
Kumar Sangakkara normally bowls Malinga in very short spells at the start, rarely more than two. It was surprising to see him pressed into service for a fourth over here -- but the first ball of the extended spell produced what the Lankan captain was clearly hoping for: for his main bowler to take out the main batsman in the opposition. The ball was wide of off going wider; Tendulkar, who till then seemed remarkably composed, chased that and got the thick outer edge through to a delighted Sangakkara, and with that both openers were back in the hut inside of 7 overs, courtesy the Lankan spearhead.
4-0-11-2 for Malinga and with India on 32/2 after 7, the Lankan slinger had decisively changed the course of the game. Also, he had given his bowling mates all the cover they needed to tighten the noose, since from that point on India was always going to be on the defensive, permitting the bowling side to pretty much stick to their plans.
Virat Kohli, runless for the first ten balls he played, clipped Kulasekhara off his pads to the midwicket fence to get off the mark, then stroked him through the off for two more, and at the ten over mark, India had moved to 41/2. Not an ideal start -- and that is an understatement. But it does represent opportunity for established players like Yuvraj, Dhoni and Gambhir, and rising stars like Raina and Kohli, to put on a show.

India innings: 11-20:
With the Indian batsmen chipping the medium pacers around, Suraj Randiv was brought on in the 14th over, and a shimmy by Gautam Gambhir to chip over mid off saw Kulasekhara come in off the line and dive forward in a brave attempt to make a catch of it.
That little bit of drama aside, India in almost imperceptible fashion fought its way back into the game. Gambhir and Kohli stroked singles around the park, got the bowlers distracted and fidgety, pounced on lapses to stroke the fours, and kept the board ticking over -- which is how games are played and, often, won. What the doomsday prophets who called the game after the exit of Sehwag and Sachin omitted from their calculations is this: Lanka, after losing their big hitting openers inside the first 15, managed just 83/2 at the end of 20 overs. In other words, the opportunity for India is not in a final assault, but in overhauling the Lankan pace in the middle overs and setting themselves less of an ask towards the end.
Randiv was joined by Dilshan in the 17th, but again, on a track where the turn is on the slower side, two batsmen who know how to play spin faced little difficulty pressing back when length permitted, and when exasperated bowlers increased the length, promptly going forward to stroke the ball around. It was percentage batting of quality, and the crowd (those who remained after the exit of Sachin) gradually climbed back into the contest as the runs ticked on. That forced Kumar to remove Dilshan and bring on his withheld trump, Murali.
Very early in the over, Gambhir showed what the play would be when he pressed deep back in his crease and stroked Murali through point for a brace (that Kumar missed taking a simple throw to effect a run out was a coda to that stroke). The over also saw Gambhir move to a nicely stroked, if not entirely chance-free, 50 off 56.
After 20, India was 105/2 (a little matter of 22 runs ahead of where Lanka was at this point). Significantly, India was still going at 5+ -- in other words, the ask was not being allowed to slip too far.

India innings: 21-30:
It takes big moments to change games, and Dilshan produced one such in the 22nd. Kumar had to bring him back, to try and save overs of his top two spinners (keeping in mind that his two back up seamers were not particularly effective).
Kohli drove at Dilshan, but failed to control the shot and off the leading edge, it was flying towards his batting partner. Gambhir got out of the way of the shot, and that gave the bowler just enough room to check, lunge to his right, and pull off a blinder. Kohli's 35 off 49 had helped stitch together an 83-run partnership in 15.3 overs that put the innings back on track, but that blinder terminated the partnership just when it was beginning to be dangerous.
Later in the same over, Kumar muffed a tough stumping off his opposite number, to go with the run out he had missed off Gambhir. Whatever the rights and wrongs of the toss, one thing is fairly clear: Kumar is feeling as much pressure as the Indians are on the chase.
Needing at least another wicket, Kumar brought Malinga back in the 27th, far earlier than he is normally accustomed to. The Lankan quick normally bowls two overs at the top of the innings, then comes back for two or so in the late middle, and then shuts down the chase. Here, his comeback over was his 50th, and it was still shy of the 30 over mark -- calculations the batting side would likely be making out there.
After 30, India had moved to 150/3 (Sri Lanka was 134/3). And the game was set up -- which way it will swing will be decided in the ten overs to follow.

India innings: 31-40:
This is it -- the batting I was waiting for. Nothing flash -- just calculated batting, never allowing any bowler, including the feared Murali and Malinga, to settle.
Dhoni and Gambhir kept knocking them around the park; pressure built as it was bound to; bowlers feeling it erred, as they were bound to, and the two batsmen cashed in on every available opportunity. The 50 runs between 150-200 took a mere 48 balls, which when you consider the context, was brilliant work.
The trick had to be to remember the carnage of the last five overs, and the fact that the overs between 41-50 produced 91 for the Lankans. That is a bridge too far -- the trick had to be to reduce the ask in the last ten overs. And that is what the Indians worked out to perfection. With calculated assaults and gritty running, they got the score to 221 at the end of 40. Which basically meant that India had made up for the late charge by the Lankans, and left them with less than a run a ball, including the power play.
Equally to the point, they neutralized the Lankan spinners and attacked Kulasekhara, forcing Kumar to try over after over of Malinga's. At the 40 over mark, Lanka's spearhead had gone through 7, leaving him with just three to bowl during the power plays. And the cat and mouse game is set up -- because India can now delay taking the power plays and keep knocking the runs down.

India innings: 41-50:
It was almost anti-climactic -- despite Gautam Gambhir's rush of blood charge that saw him bowled three short of what would have been the most memorable century of his career.
Heading into the straight needing to chase down a run a ball, with MS Dhoni stroking in form, Yuvraj replacing Gautam, and Raina still to come, it was India's to lose. And this India is not losing too many, not if it can help it.
Mathematical, it proved. So dominant was India that Murali backed off from bowling in the PPs. And India broke the game open against Malinga, the most feared of the opposition bowlers. Needing 16 off 18 heading into the 48th over, Dhoni smashed the Lankan quick twice to the square leg ropes to turn the chase into a fait accompli, India ending that over with just 5 needed off 12. Fittingly, Dhoni ended it with a humongous hit over the long on ropes, to seal a six wicket win.
Think of that one more time -- just two wickets went down after Sachin and Sehwag, and at the end, it had batting to spare.
As chases go, this one ranks with the best India has ever been involved in -- and when you factor in the occasion, the pressure, the early loss of two powerful batsmen -- you could say this is it, the game that tells this team that nothing, not a thing on the cricket field, is beyond them once they set their minds to do it.
Enjoy the win -- such moments come once in a lifetime.








April 01, 2011

Nudity & Hyundai offer @ World Cup

Best and spicy offers are flowing for Indian Cricket squad as they are heading nerve breaking World Cup final match today.hyundai Motor India Limited, the official car partner of the ICC cricket World Cup 2011 announced that all the members of Indian squad will be gifted the new Verna car, if they win the World Cup. Company will be extremely delighted to felicitate the squad with all new Verna much ahead of its market launch in the country. Along with this, we do have famous sexy model Poonam Pandey readying to go nude in the stadium and dressing room very next moment Indian wins the final match.

Lucky dudes, they have luxury with nudity in the offering. Go guys...get the Cup and have fun. by the way, here is an information that tariff for 10 seconds advertisment during World Cup final has been raised from 18 to 20 Lakhs.

March 28, 2011

Bollywood beauty spits fire on media about Yuvaraj?

Everyone knew that, Bollywood beauty has tried her hand with several cricketers and her co-stars during the last few years. Young and dynamic cricketer Yuvaraj Singh also fall prey to her but some how able to skip her bait. During the recent India and Australia cricket match, Yuvi while taking the Man of the Match Award has stated that, he is very much inspired by a person, but he will reveal the name of that person only after winning the world cup. Then, media which knew about his affair with Bollywood glamour doll Deepika Padukone, has come with relevant stories about their affair and confirmed that, he is inspired by the glamour queen Deepika Padukone.

When, this news reached the ears of Deepika, she virtually turns a fireball on media. She spit fire on the gossipmongers. She said “Indeed, we are good friends. But, our friendship has never reached to such a level that can inspire the others lives. Yuvi is also one of my friends. That’s all. We have never met in the recent times. Then, how can the media write about us such rubbish things. These rumors make our lives miserable. I am really very much hurt with this kind of gossips. Media should know the facts before writing something on people like us.”

Warrior Prince: A film on Sourav Ganguly

A documentary feature film on Royal Bengal Tiger sourav ganguly named as ‘The Warrior Prince’ is directed by popular cricket journalist Mithali Goshal. This feature film is screened yesterday in ESPN/Star Sports channel portrayed the amazing sportsman from a lesser known perspective. The documentary features other cricket legends, such as Sachin Tendulkar, Ricky Ponting, Virender Sehwag, Yuvraj Singh including with rivals like Steve Waugh, Ricky Ponting and others testifying about sourav ganguly’s career and about various character traits of India’s former captain. Mitali Ghosal started working at a documentary featuring Ganguly in 2008 and finally it is out in media. Undoubtedly sourav ganguly is the star cricketer who changed the phase of Indian cricket towards aggression.

March 27, 2011

India vs Pakistan ( Semi Final ) match FIXED!!!! India gonna Lose!!! Cricket world cup 2011

THIS NEWS FLASH ON 09/03/2011 BY CNEB NEWS CHANNEL SOURCE BY MR.? VISHAVA BANDHU GUPTA (FORMER INCOME TAX COMMISSIONER) INDIA.

ye channel ne prabhu chawla (aaj tak) ko phattey lagaya barkha dutt? (NDTV), rajdeep sardesai (IBN) ko b benakaab kara neera radia phone tapeing case mai ab world cup b lapetey mai hai inke

Bookie 'Pradeep Agarwal' spotted in Team India dressing room during Worldcup 2011

What was he doing there ????????????????????

India may lose match vs Pakistan as Rs 20,000 cr wager exceeds for India aginst Pak. Bookies need 3 players to sabotage match to get Rs20K.


If Mafia has his way, India shall lose WC match against Pakistan in sf. It shall make a killing of Re 20 thousand crore or lose Rs 5,000 crore if P wins.

March 21, 2011

Poonam Pandey to go NUDE in the stadium: If India Win





Model and aspiring actress Poonam Pandey swears that she will bare all if the Indian cricket team wins the World Cup.Poonam follows in the footsteps of lingerie models like Larissa Riquelme of Paraguay and Luciana Salazar of Argentina,who had vowed to go nude if their football teams were to win the FIFA World Cup.Poonam says,Im a cricket fanatic and Im a die-hard supporter of my nation.India needs a lot of support and this is my way of supporting the team. We wonder how this will help the team.
So,is this more of a publicity stunt Absolutely not.Im confident of my body and Im doing this to incite our boys to play better, she says.In fact,the model wants to contact the team and strip in front of them in their dressing room.If not,she says she doesnt even have any qualms about undressing at the stadium.




Wat Do U think ? Is She really want to India to win world Cup ? or This is Pure Publicity Stunt ! or She has confidence dat india willnot win the worldcup and by making this stament she can get freeeee publicity ! Give Ur answer as comment !

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...